Despite the fact that Twitter has more than 32 million users, has received massive publicity from both celebrities and government, and produced remarkable results for companies like Dell and Zappos, many business executives still don't “get” Twitter. Granted, there is an awful lot of noise (“Just got back from the gym…eating pizza again for lunch…watch a Seinfeld rerun”), self-promotion and spam-like content on the world's most popular microblogging service—and to newbies it can seem like a bizarre online cocktail party where everyone is shouting and no one is listening—but for those who understand and learn to use it effectively, Twitter can be a powerful business tool.
Here are seven reasons every business needs to be on Twitter.
To Interact with Customers
For most business, it's far easier and more profitable to generate continued or new business from existing customers than it is to acquire new ones. Growing existing customer business requires ongoing communication. Staying in touch with customers on Twitter is not only more real-time than many other techniques, it's also far more cost-effective than direct mail, attending trade shows, picking up the phone, or even maintaining a customer newsletter. It's not that Twitter can replace other touchpoints completely of course, but it can reduce the required cost and frequency of high-touch interactions.
To Interact with Prospects
Just as many of your customers are probably on Twitter, so are your prospects. They care far less about your advertising than about what your customers are saying about you, and how you respond. An active Twitter presence enables you to demonstrate strong customer service, rather than just claiming you offer it (after all, who advertises poor customer service?).
To Influence the Influencers
Industry analysts, journalists, bloggers and other influencers from most sectors of the economy are well-represented on Twitter. Tweeting content of your own that will interest them (i.e. not just your marketing materials), retweeting content they post, and engaging in dialog is a great way to get these people talking, and writing, about your company. It's less formal, more “social” and usually more effective than “cold” outreach.
To Gain Market Intelligence
The fact that customers, prospects and industry thought leaders are all using Twitter make it a valuable tool for monitoring the topics and concerns being discussed. This is a great potential source of new product/service enhancement ideas as well as topics for blog posts, white papers or other content.
To Become a Resource
Prospects don't care about your products or services—they care about solving their problems. Demonstrating your knowledge of their industry and their challenges, for example by tweeting your thought-leadership blog posts and white papers, makes you a resource they can go to for helpful information. That gives you the opportunity to explain how your products or services can help them, in a consultative fashion.
To Give the Business a Personality
Business websites are, necessarily, one-to-many communication. No matter how compellingly your site presents your value proposition, it's still formal and impersonal. Twitter is a much more casual and conversational. Again using the example of Zappos, CEO Tony Hsieh has been successful on Twitter by sharing his personality. Unlike a company website, Twitter is immediate, informal and personal.
To Be Part of the Conversation
As noted above, your customers, prospects and key influencers are already having conversations about your industry, your competition—and quite possibly your company—on Twitter. If you aren't participating in that conversion, you're missing valuable intelligence, business opportunities, and possibly even the opportunity to prevent damage to your firm's reputation.
Twitter is far more than a 140-character soapbox for celebrities, spammy “Internet marketers” and the incorrigibly obnoxious. Savvy business tweeters can filter out the cacophony and create valuable dialogs with key participants in their marketplace.
This piece was originally published in the Web Market Central blog.
Link to original postLink to original post























Courtney Hunt said:
Tom, while there may be no question of the "if" from your perspective or mine, most business leaders are far less certain. Plus, the "if" applies to individual platforms and channels, not just social media generally. Again, there is an irony that many social media mavens advocate the need to meet clients/customers where they are - and yet they are not particularly good at walking their own talk! Allowing the conversation to focus on "if's" is likely to be far more palatable and ultimately convincing for these leaders than a conversation centered on "you better or else."
The use and value of Twitter is overstated in my view. Relative to other platforms, the population of users and their activity are both pretty low, and there's been a flattening lately (there's an SMT post on that somewhere - maybe by Brian Solis?). In another great post, Brian Solis provides global statististics that demonstrate that Twitter is fairly localized, with the greatest use in the US in Australia I believe. So, from a global perspective, it can't add a lot of value yet.
For Twitter to truly achieve its potential, it needs to mature on multiple levels. Once it does, then the value to both individuals and organizations will be more clear and the usage levels will reach appropriate, sustainable levels.
One other thought: The impact of social media on organizations will be FAR GREATER than the current attention being received by marking/branding/customer service. Overemphazing the external applications of social media also demonstrates a lack of strategic perspective and can again undermine the very goals that social media advocates strive to achieve.
- reply
- 0 points
Mon, 2010-03-08 09:30 — Courtney HuntTomPick said:
- reply
- 0 points
Mon, 2010-03-08 09:06 — Tom PickCourtney Hunt said:
- reply
- 0 points
Mon, 2010-03-08 08:42 — Courtney HuntTomPick said:
You made some excellent points, so I certainly didn't want to "shout you down." I'm not a huge fan of Facebook for b2b companies and never push that on clients, though I am working with a few on making creative use of that. I just haven't seen anyone in the b2b space really get results from FB (Twitter is another story).
Thanks for the kind words on the book review, hope you enjoy today's on webbiquity.com as well.
- reply
- 0 points
Mon, 2010-03-01 09:02 — Tom PickSmartSelling said:
Tom,
You’re response to my first point is very much in line with my thinking – so I’ll take it we’re on the same page.
As I noted earlier, my frustration is with commentators who keep shouting about Twitter being mandatory and then accusing anyone who dissents as not getting it. Equally frustrating is that Twitter (and to some extent Facebook) dominates public discussion, which in turn leads to business leaders writing them off as irrelevant.
Examples like the ones you mentioned help CEO’s see the bigger picture and the possibilities.
As an aside, my comments about guru’s was directed at others in this space (nice job on the eMarketing book review btw)
Mark
- reply
- 0 points
Sun, 2010-02-28 17:26 — SmartSellingTomPick said:
1) You're right, not every business needs to be on Twitter. My wife's hair stylist probably doesn't need to Twitter, and neighbor's dog groomer likely wouldn't see much benefit from it either. But every business person should think about Twitter, or social media more broadly, and do what makes sense for their situation. The dog groomer, for example, may not benefit from Twitter but how about a Facebook page to show off her work, especially when one of her "clients" wins a dog show? And my wife's stylist recently added online appointment-setting capabilities. Thinking about new technologies and trends can lead to helpful new ideas, even if not the obvious ones.
2) I've never referred to myself as a social media "expert" or "guru," but if you view me that way - thank you! I'm honored.
3) I'm with you 100% on the Twitter issues. The occasional appearance of the fail whale was somewhat acceptable/understandable in the early days of the service, but now that is an established, widely used and relied upon tool, there's no excuse for not getting these issues resolved. This doesn't happen with Amazon or Google, and shouldn't with Twitter.
- reply
- 0 points
Sat, 2010-02-27 10:14 — Tom PickSmartSelling said:
Tom,
I run two Twitter accounts and our businesses have benefited from it. We attribute 2-3% of our sales volume to Twitter in one business. So I consider myself a fan of Twitter.
But I have two points for you to consider:
Your points are all valid, but let’s not gloss over the short comings and the issues.
- reply
- 0 points
Sat, 2010-02-27 00:02 — SmartSellingTomPick said:
Two other points. First, it's my experience also that many busy executives still aren't on Twitter. But particularly over the past year, and increasing number of them are joining, including some I know who I never would have expected to see on Twitter. Second, even if the executive assigns this to a junior staffer, that staffer often has at least some influence in certain purchase decisions, and Twitter interaction can influence that influence.
- reply
- 0 points
Fri, 2010-02-26 10:17 — Tom Pickpatmcgraw said:
I use Twitter for a variety of reasons - several of which you cited. But I will be very honest with you - very few of my target audience is on Twitter because they are business executives and they don't have time to tell everyone that they just go back from the gym. They have client meetings, vendor meetings, and sales calls so they rely on a junior staffer to handle that 'social media stuff' because that's why they were hired.
I have asked my qualified leads and clients - that's what they have told me. I have gone to their biz websites - and have seen that the C-level exec isn't writing many blogs, or tweeting.
Anyway, my point is this - every business doesn't have to be on Twitter today. It might not be a bad thing to consider - but it isn't a requirement.
Oh, and most of these people pick up the phone and schedule a meeting with their client when they want to interact with them - kinda ol' school but they prefer to keep it real. Pressing the flesh, playing some golf, buying lunch or dinner - these are still highly effective ways of interacting with clients and you're not limited to 140 characters.
- reply
- 0 points
Fri, 2010-02-26 08:32 — Pat McGrawTomPick said:
Mark - great story! Reminds me that I need to get out more.
John - agreed, and I think the ease of following/unfollowing means that, over time, only those who add value will really have influence.
Suzanne - excellent point. There are a number of good "Twitter for newbies" posts around as well. Business owners / marketers new to Twitter may want to start by finding some relevant people to follow and just listening at first, but the important thing is to get started!
- reply
- 0 points
Thu, 2010-02-25 18:04 — Tom PickSuzanneDewey said:
- reply
- 0 points
Mon, 2010-02-22 17:08 — SuzanneDeweyPost new comment