
If you've been following the
digital discourse set off by the
alleged $11,000 fine levied by the FTC against some bloggers, then you might enjoy Thursday evening's Twitter exchange between
BuzzMachine's
Jeff Jarvis and
Mediashift's
Mark Glazer (@mediatwit).
In case you've been out of the country, the FTC last week instituted its long-awaited guidelines designed to ferret out commercial deception in the social spheres.
Mathew Ingram managed to tease out the tête-à-tête by tweeting Jeff to Mark's POV on the new rules.
Here's the exchange as it unfolded in 140-character twincrements:
mathewi: @jeffjarvis? RT @mediatwit: I think the FTC rules are good. I doubt they will enforce every tiny thing and any push for transparency is good
jeffjarvis: @mediatwit Good, God, Mark, you endorse the FTC rules in a tweet? Shall we discuss govt interference in public speech? The 1st Amendment?
jeffjarvis: @mediatwit And I don't buy the FTC's pr on this: 'Oh, don't worry about us.' What matters is the rules. Successors will enforce.
jeffjarvis: @mediatwit But do the FTC rules extend to journalists on papers, magazines? No. So bloggers become 2nd class citizens w/fewer rights.
jeffjarvis: @mediatwit Of
... read more >>