Engagement Marketing Definition
Because the term marketing is commonly interpreted to mean only the process of promotion of a company, I use the term engagement marketing to explain the process of listening to customers and taking action on what they have heard. To me engagement marketing covers each of the four P's of marketing including promotion. Engagement marketing really means “marketing,” but it is better to support or coin another marketing related phrase such as “engagement marketing,” in order to explain how the process of marketing works best when a strategy of listening and taking action upon what a company has learned as a result of what is learned is used.
Link to original post
Other Posts by John Cass
3 Social Media & PR Tips for the Best Buy Ethics Blog - September 27, 2011
Histories Of Social Media - November 5, 2010
Blogging Platforms Used By Top U.S. Interactive Agencies - November 5, 2010
Corporate Blogs In The Fortune 500 - October 26, 2010
Patience Is Needed In Social Media Event Marketing - August 24, 2010
» Already a member? Login now to comment!
» Not a member? Register to comment!
RonMorrison said:
Joh, Okay - I can maybe buy that. Maybe. Don't misunderstand me here. What I'm about to say may sound a bit argumentative - that's not my point. Nor do I want to be pedantic about it. My point is to dissuade us from creating more clutter in the medium or making it more of an untouchable/unreachable entity. But then you close with "social media has given the profession a better chance to really listen, and take action." Better than what? Better then face to face feedback that has been given to supervisors over the years. Better than the feedback of sales drops at Sears? Better than the telephonic complaints of PC's turning to blue screens of death. The profession has had the ability to react in direct proportion as the consumer base has had to express. If you're suggesting that social media makes business react more to consumer complaints or suggestions, more to the market conversations that are going on then you're suggesting that somehow "reading" the conversation makes a person or person more accountable. That's the issue that I have. I think that makes the social media market in some ways sound mystic.I do agree that because of social media (and web2.0 internet medium) more consumers and more easily express their voice. I do believe that the market conversations that consumers have do in fact rise over the rabble of traditional marketing and advertising. I do believe that consumers can truly express - more. I will grant that the additional market conversation, the volume of consumer voice both in quantity and detail make seeing the issue(s) easier for business. I do agree that it's nearly impossible for businesses today not to hear their customers clearly. Perhaps it's that clarity of message that points a massive finger at individuals and departments within business do deal with their issues. In that sense... the bullhorn is your engagement prod. On that point no doubt we agree.
Thanks again John - I've learned a great deal from reading and responding to your post.
johncass said:
Ron, I am so with you on this one. I wish I did not have to coin yet another "marketing" phrase, there have been so many of them. However, when you and I talk about marketing we understand listening is at the the essence of the process. Listening supports marketing, whether that promotion, price or product, and if acted upon gives companies a boost in competitiveness.Ironically, the reason I did coin this phrase is to reclaim the meaning of marketing, rather than to abandon the term "marketing". I've had a similar discussion with Don Schultz and from Northwestern (http://www.medill.northwestern.edu/faculty/imc.aspx?id=59637) and his recommendation was not to try and explain that marketing is also about listening, as the business world perceives marketing to be defined as promotion.
On your point about mediums. Even though this website is about social media. When I write my blog, I write about many marketing related topics, and social media today aggregates the content anyway. Engagement marketing is not really just about social media. I just think that social media has given the profession a better chance to really listen, and take action.
RonMorrison said:
I like the creativity of your idea. However it feels that you're looking for ways to build additional catch phrases or esoteric labels on marketing 101 or customer service 101. Here's what I mean. Marketing, customer support, response-resolution all of these things existed in every major phase of marketing (at least in the US) that we've had since selling wheat to India (but I digress). We took consumer input when the medium was salespeople selling door to door and receiving consumer feedback. We resolved issues that consumers brought to our attention when the telephone was the most expedient feedback mechanism. No doubt email made for faster and easier feedback and "action taking" on the part of business. It's all been there - always. It's word-of-mouth coupled with listening. It's being willing to act upon what you hear. Some might even call it courtesy or even simply professionalism.I don't believe that the evolution of mediums for feedback are reasons to relable the medium or the process. Feedback is feeback. Marketing is marketing. Listening is listening. I don't think that the medium dictates the action as expected and deserved by the consumer. What dictates engagement is a human business/being that's willing to engage because it's the obvious and right course of action. I don't feel that businesses will do more of the right thing simply because the right thing has been renamed to sound more like marketing. As a matter of fact, come to think of it experience tells me that that might have business doing less of it.
Again - I do like the creativity in your idea.
Jonathan Salem Baskin is an author who writes a regular column on Advertising Age & posts on his award-winning blog. More »
John Bell heads up the 360° Digital Influence team & teaches graduate studies in Digital Influence at Johns Hopkins University. More »
Don Bulmer is Vice President of Communication Strategy at Royal Dutch Shell More »
John Byrne is chairman & editor-in-chief of C-Change Media Inc. & the author or co-author of eight books. More »
Gini Dietrich Gini Dietrich is the founder and chief executive officer of Arment Dietrich, Inc. More »
Vanessa DiMauro is the CEO of Leader Networks & has been creating successful online communities for over 15 years. More »
Maggie Fox is the founder and CEO of Social Media Group & was named one of the Top 100 Marketers in Marketing Magazine. More »
Laurent Francois I lead the marketing&development hub @ Express Roularta Services, a media company. I focus on 2 main brands (L'Express, More »
Rachel Happe is a Co-Founder and Principal at The Community Roundtable & a blogger at The Social Organization. More »
JD Lasica is a consultant who is considered one of the leading authorities on social media & user-created media. More »
Brian Solis s author of Engage and is recognized as one of the most prominent thought leaders & authors in new media. More »
- YOU
- David Amerland
- Jay Baer
- Rohit Bhargava
- Sandy Carter
- Vanessa DiMauro
- Debra Ellis
- Paul Fabretti
- Sally Falkow
- Cliff Figallo
- Maggie Fox
- Brad Friedman
- Urs E Gattiker
- Paul Gillin
- Eric Goldstein
- Rachel Happe
- Shel Holtz
- John Jantsch
- Beth Kanter
- Sandy Miller
- Rohn Jay Miller
- Steve Olenski
- Tom Pick
- Eric Schwartzman
- Brian Solis
- Luis Suarez
- Hollis Tibbetts
Murmuration - the most significant gathering of social marketers ever assembled in Nashville
When: Wed, 2012-02-08
Content Marketing Webinar led by Rebecca Lieb & 30% book discount
When: Wed, 2012-02-08
Integrated Social Media Marketing Conference, Hong Kong
When: Thu, 2012-02-09
World Communication Forum in Davos - "Communication on Top" 2012
When: Thu, 2012-02-09
Virtual Community Summit 2012
When: Thu, 2012-02-09
SPECIAL STATE OF THE VALLEY 2012 EDITION
When: Fri, 2012-02-10

About Social Media Today


