I wanted to echo an excellent post from ZDNet's Phil Wainewright about the over-used '2.0', ‘-aaS' and ‘-oriented' monikers.
http://clipmarks.com/images/source-bg.gif); MARGIN-BOTTOM: 8px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 4px; VERTICAL-ALIGN: middle; COLOR: rgb(102,102,102); LINE-HEIGHT: 24px; BORDER-BOTTOM: rgb(220,220,220) 1px solid; BACKGROUND-REPEAT: repeat-x; WHITE-SPACE: nowrap; HEIGHT: 24px; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(238,238,238)">clipped from blogs.zdnet.com

The tendency to slap ‘-as-a-service' on the end of anything that's offered as a shared service is now starting to rival the over-used ‘2.0′ meme.

The good news is that the concept of delivering business technology in a services idiom is hitting the mainstream. The bad news is that slapdash use of contrived modifiers like -aaS, -oriented and ‘2.0′ makes it all sound like gobbledegook to the average Joe in the street.

So why can't we just talk about 'services' and be done with it? Businesses have always delivered services — from long before software and the Web came along to help them do it better, cheaper, faster. Do we really have to call that business-as-a-service? Service-oriented business? Business 2.0? Let's not make it such a pain in the -aaS. This is how forward-looking organizations do business in the modern world.

  blog it
You may also want to get familiar with an entire alphabet soup of acronyms floating around for on-demand technologies from SaaS Week's Krissi Danielsson.

Social_as_a_service Why is it that jargon, suffixes and other linguistic contortions are systematically used every time technology is considered to operate in a quicker, smarter, cheaper and more effective way?

Most of these concepts are representing a radical change in the way businesses operate. It is also usually as much about the people, company culture, mindsets and processes as it is about the technology, tools and platforms. Furthermore, most concerned technologies have also been available for a while; sometimes well before these monikers appeared. Is it that we are finally finding innovative ways to use them to their maximum effect?

This is definitely a never-ending issue (remember the ‘.com' and ‘e-' era). The winners will probably be the ones that lead and deliver innovative solutions to solve real business problems and then invent the terms and acronyms to drive understanding of the new concept. Others who just ride the buzz wave once it starts to get popular (because it drives attention and traffic...) will be continually challenged to keep up. These followers are usually the ones broadening and modifying the initial definition so that it applies to them and finally, everyone is using the term that no longer has any useful meaning.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Link to original post